How scoring works

Every wallet starts at a neutral 500 points. Explainable rules then add or subtract points based on real on-chain behaviour fetched at analysis time. The final score is clamped to 0–1000 and mapped to a risk level. There is no machine learning and no hidden weighting — every point is attributable to a named rule, all weights live in a single published configuration, and the full rule log is stored with each analysis.

Wallet age

−100 to +200

Older wallets carry more behavioural history. Wallets under 30 days old are penalized; wallets over 3 years old earn the maximum bonus. When history is too deep to walk fully, age is reported as a lower bound.

Transaction history

−50 to +50

Depth of activity. Very thin histories reduce confidence; extensive histories add to it.

Established protocol usage

0 to +50

Interactions with major Solana protocols (Jupiter, Raydium, Orca, Marinade, Magic Eden, and others) from a curated registry.

Flagged-address exposure

−300 per category

Interactions with addresses flagged in curated intelligence feeds (drainers, rug pulls, phishing). This measures exposure, never identity.

Rapid activity bursts

−100

Dozens of transactions inside a single hour is behaviour associated with automated or speculative trading.

Token diversity

−50

Interacting with a very large number of distinct tokens in recent activity is a pattern common in speculative token trading.

Activity pattern

−10 to +30

Consistent activity over months is rewarded; long dormancy slightly reduces the score.

Confidence

Alongside every trust score, Vouch reports a confidence level (0–100%): how much on-chain evidence the score rests on. It grows with wallet age, transaction depth, the size of the analyzed activity sample, and observed protocol interactions. A brand-new wallet can score decently but will always carry low confidence — there simply isn't much behaviour to judge yet. Confidence measures evidence, not virtue: a risky wallet with a long history gets high confidence too.

Risk levels

800–1000Very Low Risk
650–799Low Risk
450–649Medium Risk
250–449High Risk
0–249Critical Risk

Principles: scores describe wallet behaviour, never personal identity. We never claim a person is a scammer — we report that a wallet shows behaviour associated with higher risk. Analyses only use real on-chain data; when data is incomplete (for example, very deep histories), the score says so explicitly.